Skip to content

News

Orangutan charades

Orangutans communicate as if they were playing charades, according to University of St Andrews research.

When using gestures to get their points across, orangutans rely on the same basic strategy that humans follow when playing the popular game and intentionally modify or repeat hand (or other) signals based on the success or failure of their first attempt.

The findings are published in today’s edition of Current Biology (2 August 2007).

One of the orangutans studied by Professor Byrne and Erica Cartmill

Professor Richard Byrne of the School of Psychology said, “We were surprised that the orangutans’ responses so clearly signaled their assessment of the audience’s comprehension. Looking at the tapes of the animal’s responses, you can easily work out whether the orangutan thinks it has been fully, partially, or not understood, without seeing what went before.”

“This means that, in effect, they are passing information back to the audience about how well they are doing in understanding them, hence our ‘charades’ analogy. In playing the game, you want primarily to convey your meaning non-verbally – as does the orangutan – but secondarily to help the team get your meaning by giving them hints as to how well they are doing.”

To find out whether orangutans intentionally communicate with people through gestures – a skill earlier attributed to chimpanzees – PhD student Erica Cartmill and Professor Byrne presented six orangutans in Jersey and Twycross Zoos with situations in which one tempting and one not-so-tempting food item had to be reached with human help.

Mother and infant

But to test the orangutans’ strategy, there was a catch. Rather than play along all the time, the experimenter sometimes purposefully misunderstood the orangutan’s requests, providing them with only half of the delicious treat in some cases and, in others, handing over the less pleasant alternative instead.

When the person they were trying to communicate with did not meet orangutans’ aims, they persisted with further attempts, the researchers reported. When partially understood, the animals narrowed down their range of signals, focusing on gestures already used and repeating them frequently. In contrast, when completely misunderstood, orangutans elaborated their range of gestures, avoiding repetition of ‘failed’ signals.

“The response showed that the orangutan had intended a particular result, anticipated getting it, and kept trying until it got the result,” Cartmill said. “The orangutans made a clear distinction between total misunderstanding, when they tended to give up on the signals they’d used already, and use new, but equivalent, ones to get the idea across, and partial misunderstanding, when they tended to repeat the signals that had already partially worked, keeping at it with vigor. The result was that understanding could be achieved more quickly.”

The orangutans’ charades-like strategy is one way to construct shared meaning from learned or ritualised signals in the absence of language, the researchers concluded. Further investigation of communication among apes may therefore provide insight into the pre-linguistic devices that helped construct the very earliest forms of hominid language.

ENDS

NOTE TO EDITORS

For more information, call Professor Richard Byrne – telephone 01334 462051 or Erica Cartmill – telephone 01334 467279, 07910 282 292 or email eac34@st-andrews.ac.uk

Images available from Claire Grainger – contact details below.

Issued by Press Office, University of St Andrews

Contacts:

Claire Grainger, Press Officer – 01334 462530, 07730 415 015 or email cg24@st-andrews.ac.uk

Gayle Cook, Press Officer – 01334 462529, 07900 050 103 or email gec3@st-andrews.ac.uk

Ref: orangutans

View the latest University press releases at http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk

Research

Related topics

Share this story

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *